Filed: Dec. 10, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-2713EA _ Fred DuVall, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Mike Bridges, in his individual capacity * and as Sheriff of Van Buren County, * Arkansas; Stephen E. James, in his * individual capacity and as Deputy * Appeal from the United States Prosecuting Attorney for Van Buren * District Court for the Eastern County, Arkansas; County of Van * District of Arkansas. Buren, Arkansas; * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendants-Appellees, * * Larry E. K
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-2713EA _ Fred DuVall, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Mike Bridges, in his individual capacity * and as Sheriff of Van Buren County, * Arkansas; Stephen E. James, in his * individual capacity and as Deputy * Appeal from the United States Prosecuting Attorney for Van Buren * District Court for the Eastern County, Arkansas; County of Van * District of Arkansas. Buren, Arkansas; * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendants-Appellees, * * Larry E. Ku..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 98-2713EA
_____________
Fred DuVall, *
*
Plaintiff-Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Mike Bridges, in his individual capacity *
and as Sheriff of Van Buren County, *
Arkansas; Stephen E. James, in his *
individual capacity and as Deputy * Appeal from the United States
Prosecuting Attorney for Van Buren * District Court for the Eastern
County, Arkansas; County of Van * District of Arkansas.
Buren, Arkansas; *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Defendants-Appellees, *
*
Larry E. Kuykendall, doing business as *
Kuykendall Cement Co.; *
*
Defendant, *
*
State of Arkansas, *
*
Defendant-Appellee. *
_____________
Submitted: December 7, 1998
Filed: December 10, 1998
_____________
Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
_____________
PER CURIAM.
Fred DuVall appeals the district court's dismissal of DuVall's 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
lawsuit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having carefully reviewed the record
and the parties' submissions, we conclude the district court properly dismissed DuVall's
action. We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-