Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ken Matthews v. Fred Porter, 98-2933 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 98-2933 Visitors: 31
Filed: Dec. 18, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-2933 _ Ken Matthews; Nan Matthews, * * Appellants, * * v. * * Fred Porter, Individually and in his * capacity as Administrator, Motor * Vehicle Division, a Section of the * Arkansas Department of Finance & * Administration; Roger Duren, Manager, * Office of Motor Vehicles, Direct * Appeal from the United States Services, individually in his own right * District Court for the and in his capacity as State Official; * Eastern District o
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                         FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                  ___________

                                  No. 98-2933
                                  ___________

Ken Matthews; Nan Matthews,               *
                                          *
              Appellants,                 *
                                          *
        v.                                *
                                          *
Fred Porter, Individually and in his      *
capacity as Administrator, Motor          *
Vehicle Division, a Section of the        *
Arkansas Department of Finance &          *
Administration; Roger Duren, Manager, *
Office of Motor Vehicles, Direct          * Appeal from the United States
Services, individually in his own right   * District Court for the
and in his capacity as State Official;    * Eastern District of Arkansas.
Ford Motor Company, Dearborn,             *
Michigan; Brian J. Roberts, Warranty      *   [UNPUBLISHED]
Administration Office, Ford Motor         *
Company, Detroit, Michigan,               *
individually and as a FMC employee;       *
DOES, Other Arkansas Revenue              *
Department, Ford staff names unknown *
at this time,                             *
                                          *
              Appellees.                  *
                                     ___________

                         Submitted: December 7, 1998
                             Filed: December 18, 1998
                                 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
                                    ___________

PER CURIAM.

        Ken and Nan Matthews appeal from the district court&s1 dismissal of their
complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to
state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Having carefully reviewed the record
and the parties& submissions, we conclude that the district court was correct. See
Double D Spotting Serv., Inc. v. Supervalu, Inc., 
136 F.3d 554
, 557 (8th Cir. 1998) (de
novo standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

      A true copy.

             Attest:

                         CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




      1
       The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.

                                          -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer