Filed: Feb. 03, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-8219 _ * Cyril A. Kolocotronis * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri * Veera Dr. Reddy, M.D. * [UNPUBLISHED] Psychiat., * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 29, 1998 Filed: February 3, 1999 _ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Cyril A. Kolocotronis filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas action contesting the administration of psyc
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-8219 _ * Cyril A. Kolocotronis * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri * Veera Dr. Reddy, M.D. * [UNPUBLISHED] Psychiat., * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 29, 1998 Filed: February 3, 1999 _ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Cyril A. Kolocotronis filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas action contesting the administration of psych..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 97-8219
___________
*
Cyril A. Kolocotronis *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Eastern District of Missouri
*
Veera Dr. Reddy, M.D. * [UNPUBLISHED]
Psychiat., *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 29, 1998
Filed: February 3, 1999
___________
Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Cyril A. Kolocotronis filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas action contesting the
administration of psychotropic medication. The district court transferred the petition
to this court because Kolocotronis had not obtained our authorization prior to filing a
successive petition. Although Kolocotronis captioned his complaint as a federal
habeas petition, his claims should have been brought as a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
challenging forced medication as a condition of his confinement. See Washington v.
Harper,
494 U.S. 210 (1990); Walton v. Norris,
59 F.3d 67 (8th Cir. 1998). We
therefore remand this matter to the district court for further consideration of the matter
as a section 1983 claim.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-