Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Billy Welch, 98-2843 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 98-2843 Visitors: 27
Filed: May 12, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-2843 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Billy Edward Welch, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: May 3, 1999 Filed: May 12, 1999 _ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Billy Edward Welch pleaded guilty for conspiring to distribute methamphetamine and for attempting to escape. On appeal, Welch contends th
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 98-2843
                                    ___________

United States of America,                *
                                         *
                    Appellee,            * Appeal from the United States
                                         * District Court for the Eastern
      v.                                 * District of Arkansas.
                                         *
Billy Edward Welch,                      *      [UNPUBLISHED]
                                         *
                    Appellant.           *
                                    ___________

                            Submitted: May 3, 1999
                                Filed: May 12, 1999
                                   ___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Billy Edward Welch pleaded guilty for conspiring to distribute methamphetamine
and for attempting to escape. On appeal, Welch contends the district court improperly
rejected his request to withdraw his guilty plea. Having searched the record and
considered the parties' submissions, we find no merit in Welch's contention that he had
been subjected to threats and intimidation by Arkansas law enforcement officers. We
decline to consider Welch's ineffective assistance of counsel arguments. See United
States v. Iversen, 
90 F.3d 1340
, 1342 (8th Cir. 1996) (ineffective assistance claim
raised for first time on appeal is properly addressed in 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 motion). We
thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

      Attest:

               CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                              -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer