Filed: Apr. 05, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-2845 _ Richard M. Hedrick, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Allen Pfeiffer; Gary A. Janssen; Dunn * L. Donald, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 5, 1999 Filed: April 5, 1999 _ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Richard M. Hedrick appeals from the district court&s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. §
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-2845 _ Richard M. Hedrick, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Allen Pfeiffer; Gary A. Janssen; Dunn * L. Donald, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 5, 1999 Filed: April 5, 1999 _ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Richard M. Hedrick appeals from the district court&s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 98-2845
___________
Richard M. Hedrick, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Allen Pfeiffer; Gary A. Janssen; Dunn *
L. Donald, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 5, 1999
Filed: April 5, 1999
___________
Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Richard M. Hedrick appeals from the district court&s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against City of Waverly, Nebraska employees
Allen Pfeiffer and Gary A. Janssen, and City attorney Donald L. Dunn, in their
individual and official capacities. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties&
briefs, we conclude the district court&s judgment was correct, and an extended
1
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
discussion is not warranted. We also deny Hedrick&s motion to assess excess costs
against appellees’ counsel.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-