Filed: Nov. 29, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3922 _ Erma Evans, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. AT&T Corporation, Originally sued as * "American Telephone & Telegraph * [UNPUBLISHED] Company," * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 22, 1999 Filed: November 29, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Erma Evans appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for the
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3922 _ Erma Evans, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. AT&T Corporation, Originally sued as * "American Telephone & Telegraph * [UNPUBLISHED] Company," * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 22, 1999 Filed: November 29, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Erma Evans appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for the d..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-3922 ___________ Erma Evans, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. AT&T Corporation, Originally sued as * "American Telephone & Telegraph * [UNPUBLISHED] Company," * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: November 22, 1999 Filed: November 29, 1999 ___________ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Erma Evans appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for the defendant, AT&T Corporation. Evans contends the district court abused its discretion in granting the motion because there are genuine issues of fact about Evans's eligibility for benefits under AT&T's Sickness and Accident Plan and under its Long Term Disability Plan. Having considered the parties' briefs and the record, we agree with the district court that Evans knowingly ended her employment with AT&T when she accepted and cashed her termination allowance check and thus made herself ineligible for disability benefits available only to AT&T employees. We affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
