Filed: May 19, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1151 _ Garry Dean Ensey, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Arkansas Board of Pardons & Paroles, * Arkansas Department of Correction; * [UNPUBLISHED] Joelle Deppa, Director, RSVP Program, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 7, 1999 Filed: May 19, 1999 _ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Garry Dean Ensey
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1151 _ Garry Dean Ensey, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Arkansas Board of Pardons & Paroles, * Arkansas Department of Correction; * [UNPUBLISHED] Joelle Deppa, Director, RSVP Program, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 7, 1999 Filed: May 19, 1999 _ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Garry Dean Ensey ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-1151
___________
Garry Dean Ensey, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Arkansas Board of Pardons & Paroles, *
Arkansas Department of Correction; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Joelle Deppa, Director, RSVP Program, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: May 7, 1999
Filed: May 19, 1999
___________
Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Garry Dean Ensey appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal
without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. After
1
The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
carefully reviewing the record and Mr. Ensey’s brief, we conclude dismissal without
prejudice was proper for the reasons the district court stated and that an extended
discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-