Filed: Sep. 22, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1197 _ Lutheran Health Care Association of * St. Louis, Missouri, doing business as * Lutheran Medical Center, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health * [UNPUBLISHED] and Human Services, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 17, 1999 Filed: September 22, 1999 _ Before BEAM, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PE
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1197 _ Lutheran Health Care Association of * St. Louis, Missouri, doing business as * Lutheran Medical Center, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health * [UNPUBLISHED] and Human Services, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 17, 1999 Filed: September 22, 1999 _ Before BEAM, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-1197 ___________ Lutheran Health Care Association of * St. Louis, Missouri, doing business as * Lutheran Medical Center, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health * [UNPUBLISHED] and Human Services, * * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: September 17, 1999 Filed: September 22, 1999 ___________ Before BEAM, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. The court has considered the briefs and heard oral arguments in this Medicare reimbursement appeal. Having reviewed the record in the context of Lutheran Health Care Association's contentions, we find the record supports the district court's decisions. Because the parties' submissions show they are thoroughly familiar with the issues before the court as well as the controlling legal principles, we conclude that an extensive discussion would serve no useful purpose. We agree with the district court's rulings and thus affirm for the reasons stated in its memorandum and opinion without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
