Filed: Apr. 15, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1486 _ Barbara McGee, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Sgt. Nickolas Fredriken, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 22, 1999 Filed: April 15, 1999 _ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Barbara McGee commenced this action against a Drug Enforcement Administration officer seeking return of a forfeited automobile or co
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1486 _ Barbara McGee, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Sgt. Nickolas Fredriken, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 22, 1999 Filed: April 15, 1999 _ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Barbara McGee commenced this action against a Drug Enforcement Administration officer seeking return of a forfeited automobile or com..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-1486
___________
Barbara McGee, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
Sgt. Nickolas Fredriken, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: March 22, 1999
Filed: April 15, 1999
___________
Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Barbara McGee commenced this action against a Drug Enforcement
Administration officer seeking return of a forfeited automobile or compensatory
damages. Because the relief she seeks would operate against the United States,
McGee’s claim is subject to the six-year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C.
§ 2401(a). See Hawaii v. Gordon,
373 U.S. 57 (1963). A notice of forfeiture was
mailed to McGee’s husband, the vehicle’s registered owner, in May 1990; he filed a
claim and cost bond. Notice of the vehicle’s seizure was published for three
successive weeks in August 1990. A default judgment of forfeiture was entered in
April 1991. McGee commenced this action in August 1997. In these circumstances,
we agree with the district court1 that McGee’s claim is time-barred.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. Rule 47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1
The HONORABLE RODNEY W. SIPPEL, United States District Judge for
the Eastern District of Missouri.
-2-