Filed: Nov. 24, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1808 _ Cindy J. Korver, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 18, 1999 Filed: November 24, 1999 _ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Cindy J. Korver appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment affirming
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1808 _ Cindy J. Korver, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 18, 1999 Filed: November 24, 1999 _ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Cindy J. Korver appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment affirming t..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-1808 ___________ Cindy J. Korver, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security, * * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: November 18, 1999 Filed: November 24, 1999 ___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Cindy J. Korver appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny Korver's application for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears and that an extended opinion would serve no useful purpose in this fact-intensive case. We find substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the decision of the Commissioner and Korver is not disabled for social security purposes. We thus affirm the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
