Filed: Dec. 21, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1839 _ Denise L. Dunkle, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner * of Social Security, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant-Appellee. * * _ Submitted: December 16, 1999 Filed: December 21, 1999 _ Before MURPHY and MAGILL Circuit Judges, and SMITH*, District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Denise Dunkle applied for benefits under Title II of the Socia
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1839 _ Denise L. Dunkle, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner * of Social Security, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant-Appellee. * * _ Submitted: December 16, 1999 Filed: December 21, 1999 _ Before MURPHY and MAGILL Circuit Judges, and SMITH*, District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Denise Dunkle applied for benefits under Title II of the Social..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-1839
___________
Denise L. Dunkle, *
*
Plaintiff-Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of South Dakota
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner *
of Social Security, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Defendant-Appellee. *
*
___________
Submitted: December 16, 1999
Filed: December 21, 1999
___________
Before MURPHY and MAGILL Circuit Judges, and SMITH*, District Judge.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Denise Dunkle applied for benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. ยงยง401-433, claiming she was disabled because of panic attacks and depression.
After a hearing, the administrative law judge found that she was not entitled to benefits
and the Appeals Council denied review. Dunkle then filed this action, and the district
*
The HONORABLE ORTRIE D. SMITH, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.
court1 granted summary judgement to the Commissioner of Social Security. Dunkle
appealed, and we have now reviewed the record and the briefs and conclude that the
decision of the administrative law judge is supported by substantial evidence in the
record as a whole. Fines v. Apfel,
149 F.3d 893, 894-5 (8th Cir. 1998). The judgment
of the district court is therefore affirmed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1
The Honorable Richard H. Battey, United States District Judge for the District
of South Dakota.
-2-