United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                     ___________

                                     No. 99-2015
                                     ___________

Bryant Young,                             *
                                          *
             Appellant,                   *
                                          * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                  * District Court for the
                                          * Eastern District of Arkansas.
Cincinnati, Inc.                          *
                                          *      [UNPUBLISHED]
             Appellee.                    *
                                     ___________

                           Submitted: October 27, 1999
                               Filed: November 1, 1999
                                   ___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
                             ___________

PER CURIAM.

        Bryant Young appeals from the district court’s1 exclusion of his expert witness
and exclusion of evidence of prior incidents, which preceded the entry of judgment as
a matter of law in favor of Cincinnati, Inc. We conclude the district court did not abuse
its discretion in these evidentiary rulings. See Peitzmeier v. Hennessy Indus., Inc., 

, 296 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 

(1997). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.


      1
        The Honorable H. David Young, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
A true copy.

      Attest:

               CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                               -2-