Filed: Dec. 22, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2106 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Christopher Meade, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: December 17, 1999 Filed: December 22, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Christopher Meade pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2106 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Christopher Meade, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: December 17, 1999 Filed: December 22, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Christopher Meade pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2106
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Northern District of Iowa.
Christopher Meade, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: December 17, 1999
Filed: December 22, 1999
___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Meade pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with
intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a)(1),
841(b)(1)(A), and 846 (1999). Over Meade’s objection, the District Court1 applied a
two-level enhancement to Meade’s offense level for possessing firearms in connection
with the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) (1997). The Court calculated Meade’s
total offense level as 33, resulting in a guidelines imprisonment range of 188-235
1
The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Northern District of Iowa.
months. After granting the government’s substantial-assistance downward-departure
motion, the District Court sentenced Meade to 150 months imprisonment and five years
supervised release. Meade appeals, arguing that the District Court erroneously applied
the weapon enhancement.
We conclude that the issue is unreviewable because Meade’s sentence is below
the applicable guidelines range, with or without the enhancement. See United States
v. Baker,
64 F.3d 439, 441 (8th Cir. 1995); United States v. Wyatt,
26 F.3d 863, 864
(8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam). Specifically, if the District Court had not applied the
weapon enhancement, Meade’s total offense level would have been 31, and his
guidelines imprisonment range would have been 151-188 months. See U.S.S.G. § 5A
(1997).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-