Filed: May 18, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-1072 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Roderick Arlyn Sayers, Jr., also known * [UNPUBLISHED] as Mister, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: May 10, 2000 Filed: May 18, 2000 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and HENDREN,* District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Roderick Arlyn Sayers, Jr. appeals his drug-related conviction. Sayers contend
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-1072 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Roderick Arlyn Sayers, Jr., also known * [UNPUBLISHED] as Mister, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: May 10, 2000 Filed: May 18, 2000 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and HENDREN,* District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Roderick Arlyn Sayers, Jr. appeals his drug-related conviction. Sayers contends..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-1072 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Roderick Arlyn Sayers, Jr., also known * [UNPUBLISHED] as Mister, * * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: May 10, 2000 Filed: May 18, 2000 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and HENDREN,* District Judge. ___________ PER CURIAM. Roderick Arlyn Sayers, Jr. appeals his drug-related conviction. Sayers contends the district court admitted inappropriate evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). Sayers also contends the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdict. We believe a discussion of the issues presented by this appeal would serve no useful * The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, sitting by designation. purpose because the controlling law is clear. We have carefully considered Sayers's contentions and find them to be without merit. We thus affirm Sayers's conviction. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
