Filed: Dec. 07, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2592 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Ezequiel Ambrosio-Lopez, also known * as Hector Arroyo-Oran, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: December 5, 2000 Filed: December 7, 2000 _ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ezequiel Ambrosio-Lopez pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the United States, having previ
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2592 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Ezequiel Ambrosio-Lopez, also known * as Hector Arroyo-Oran, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: December 5, 2000 Filed: December 7, 2000 _ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ezequiel Ambrosio-Lopez pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the United States, having previo..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-2592
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Ezequiel Ambrosio-Lopez, also known *
as Hector Arroyo-Oran, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: December 5, 2000
Filed: December 7, 2000
___________
Before BEAM, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ezequiel Ambrosio-Lopez pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the United
States, having previously been convicted of an aggravated felony and deported, in
violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). After granting a downward departure, the
district court1 sentenced him to 46 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised
release. On appeal, Ambrosio-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief and moved to
1
The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although Ambrosio-
Lopez was granted permission to file a pro se supplemental brief, he has not done so.
After review of counsel’s Anders brief, along with our independent review of the
record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988), we conclude that there
are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-