Filed: Jan. 12, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3069 _ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * vs. * Appeal from the United * States District Court Ray L. Bowman, also known as * for the Western District Charles Clark, also known as * of Missouri. C. Clark, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellant. * _ Submitted: September 14, 1999 Filed: January 12, 2000 _ Before BOWMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Ray Bowman ap
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3069 _ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * vs. * Appeal from the United * States District Court Ray L. Bowman, also known as * for the Western District Charles Clark, also known as * of Missouri. C. Clark, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellant. * _ Submitted: September 14, 1999 Filed: January 12, 2000 _ Before BOWMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Ray Bowman app..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
__________
No. 98-3069
___________
United States of America, *
*
Plaintiff - Appellee, *
*
vs. * Appeal from the United
* States District Court
Ray L. Bowman, also known as * for the Western District
Charles Clark, also known as * of Missouri.
C. Clark, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Defendant - Appellant. *
__________
Submitted: September 14, 1999
Filed: January 12, 2000
__________
Before BOWMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1
District Judge.
_________
PER CURIAM.
Ray Bowman appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of unregistered
silencer components in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). After a thorough review, we
The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States Senior District Judge for the
1
District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.
are satisfied that the district court2 correctly instructed the jury regarding the mens rea
requirement for the offense. We also conclude that a comprehensive opinion in this
case would lack precedential value. We therefore affirm on the basis of the district
court’s rulings without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
2
The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
2