Filed: Apr. 14, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2329 _ Alvin Lee Banks, Sr., * * Appellant, * * v. * * City of St. Louis; Martin Hilliard, * Project 87, Inspector; Gwendolyn * Appeal from the United States Cherry; Anne-Marie Clark; Robert T. * District Court for the Harr; Jeff S. Jamieson; Waymon * Eastern District of Missouri. Smith; Freeman Bosley, Jr.; Clarence * Harmon; Kevin Dean; Valerie Mitchell; * [UNPUBLISHED] Kevin Jones; Lee Bates; Julius * Conners; Joyce Dreste; Darryl
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2329 _ Alvin Lee Banks, Sr., * * Appellant, * * v. * * City of St. Louis; Martin Hilliard, * Project 87, Inspector; Gwendolyn * Appeal from the United States Cherry; Anne-Marie Clark; Robert T. * District Court for the Harr; Jeff S. Jamieson; Waymon * Eastern District of Missouri. Smith; Freeman Bosley, Jr.; Clarence * Harmon; Kevin Dean; Valerie Mitchell; * [UNPUBLISHED] Kevin Jones; Lee Bates; Julius * Conners; Joyce Dreste; Darryl ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2329
___________
Alvin Lee Banks, Sr., *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
City of St. Louis; Martin Hilliard, *
Project 87, Inspector; Gwendolyn * Appeal from the United States
Cherry; Anne-Marie Clark; Robert T. * District Court for the
Harr; Jeff S. Jamieson; Waymon * Eastern District of Missouri.
Smith; Freeman Bosley, Jr.; Clarence *
Harmon; Kevin Dean; Valerie Mitchell; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Kevin Jones; Lee Bates; Julius *
Conners; Joyce Dreste; Darryl Nesbitt; *
Robert Miller; Valerie Johnson, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: April 4, 2000
Filed: April 14, 2000
___________
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Alvin L. Banks, Sr. appeals the District Court’s1 order granting summary
judgment to certain defendants, and dismissing the remaining defendants under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 4(m), in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Supp. III 1997) action; he also appeals the denial
of his motion for reconsideration. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’
briefs, we affirm for the reasons expressed by the District Court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Banks&s pending motions on appeal are denied.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1
The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-