Filed: Jul. 14, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2392 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Dean Mark Prince, * Southern District of Iowa. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: July 6, 2000 Filed: July 14, 2000 _ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dean Mark Prince appeals from the final judgment entered in the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to falsely making counterfeit oblig
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2392 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Dean Mark Prince, * Southern District of Iowa. * Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: July 6, 2000 Filed: July 14, 2000 _ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dean Mark Prince appeals from the final judgment entered in the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to falsely making counterfeit obliga..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2392
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Dean Mark Prince, * Southern District of Iowa.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: July 6, 2000
Filed: July 14, 2000
___________
Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Dean Mark Prince appeals from the final judgment entered in the district court1
after he pleaded guilty to falsely making counterfeit obligations of the United States,
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 471. The district court sentenced him to thirty-three months
imprisonment and three years supervised release. For reversal, he argues the district
court erred in not granting him a downward departure under U.S. Sentencing
1
The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
Guidelines Manual § 5H1.4, p.s. (1998) on grounds that his Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) constitutes an extraordinary physical impairment.
Upon careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court’s refusal
to depart in this case was an unreviewable exercise of discretion. See United States v.
Eagle,
133 F.3d 608, 611 (8th Cir. 1998).
In addition, we deny the pending motion.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-