Filed: Jun. 05, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2451EM _ Alison D. Johnson, * * On Appeal from the United Appellant, * States District Court * for the Eastern District v. * of Missouri. * Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, * [Not To Be Published] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 24, 2000 Filed: June 5, 2000 _ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Alison Johnson appeals from the District Court’s1 grant of summary judgment to her former employer
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2451EM _ Alison D. Johnson, * * On Appeal from the United Appellant, * States District Court * for the Eastern District v. * of Missouri. * Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, * [Not To Be Published] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 24, 2000 Filed: June 5, 2000 _ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Alison Johnson appeals from the District Court’s1 grant of summary judgment to her former employer ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 99-2451EM
_____________
Alison D. Johnson, *
* On Appeal from the United
Appellant, * States District Court
* for the Eastern District
v. * of Missouri.
*
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, * [Not To Be Published]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: May 24, 2000
Filed: June 5, 2000
___________
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Alison Johnson appeals from the District Court’s1 grant of summary judgment
to her former employer in her action under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),
42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e-2000e-17. After de novo review, see Lynn v. Deaconess Med. Ctr.-W.
Campus,
160 F.3d 484, 486 (8th Cir. 1998), we conclude the District Court’s judgment
1
The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
was proper for the reasons stated in the Court’s thorough opinion. Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-