Filed: Jan. 14, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2510 _ American Cyanamid Company, * a Corporation, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * St. Louis University, a Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 28, 1999 Filed: January 14, 2000 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. American Cyanamid Company appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judg
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2510 _ American Cyanamid Company, * a Corporation, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * St. Louis University, a Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 28, 1999 Filed: January 14, 2000 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. American Cyanamid Company appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgm..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2510
___________
American Cyanamid Company, *
a Corporation, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Eastern District of Missouri.
*
St. Louis University, a Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 28, 1999
Filed: January 14, 2000
___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
American Cyanamid Company appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant
of summary judgment in its declaratory judgment action seeking to determine whether
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.060 (1994) bars an action for contribution against Cyanamid by
Saint Louis University. After de novo review, see Brown v. Home Ins. Co.,
176 F.3d
1102, 1105 (8th Cir. 1999), we conclude the district court’s judgment was proper for
1
The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
the reasons stated in its thorough opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-