Filed: Jul. 12, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2634 _ Claryce D. Graham, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Rosemount, Inc.; HealthPartners, Inc.; * HealthPartners Administrators, Inc.; * Choice Plus, a Self-Insured Employee * [UNPUBLISHED] Benefits Plan, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: June 15, 2000 Filed: July 12, 2000 _ Before MURPHY, HEANEY, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Claryce Graham brought suit a
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2634 _ Claryce D. Graham, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Rosemount, Inc.; HealthPartners, Inc.; * HealthPartners Administrators, Inc.; * Choice Plus, a Self-Insured Employee * [UNPUBLISHED] Benefits Plan, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: June 15, 2000 Filed: July 12, 2000 _ Before MURPHY, HEANEY, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Claryce Graham brought suit ag..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-2634 ___________ Claryce D. Graham, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Rosemount, Inc.; HealthPartners, Inc.; * HealthPartners Administrators, Inc.; * Choice Plus, a Self-Insured Employee * [UNPUBLISHED] Benefits Plan, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: June 15, 2000 Filed: July 12, 2000 ___________ Before MURPHY, HEANEY, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Claryce Graham brought suit against Rosemount, Inc.; HealthPartners, Inc.; HealthPartners Administrators; and ChoicePlus alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), Title VII, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the Minnesota Human Rights Act, and breach of fiduciary duty. The district court1 granted summary judgment to all the defendants on all causes of action. Graham appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment as to her ADA, ADEA, and ERISA claims. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. 1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-