Filed: Oct. 12, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2994 _ Michael L. Haynes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: October 5, 2000 Filed: October 12, 2000 _ Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the C
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2994 _ Michael L. Haynes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: October 5, 2000 Filed: October 12, 2000 _ Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the Co..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2994
___________
Michael L. Haynes, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, *
Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: October 5, 2000
Filed: October 12, 2000
___________
Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in
favor of the Commissioner of Social Security, upholding the Commissioner’s cessation
of Haynes’s disability insurance benefits based on a finding that alcoholism was a
contributing factor material to his disability. Having carefully reviewed the record and
the parties’ briefs, we conclude substantial evidence supported the Commissioner’s
1
The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2)(C) (“An individual shall not be considered to be
disabled for purposes of this subchapter if alcoholism or drug addiction would . . . be
a contributing factor material to the Commissioner’s determination that the individual
is disabled.”); Pettit v. Apfel,
218 F.3d 901, 903 (8th Cir. 2000) (claimant has initial
burden of showing that alcoholism or drug addiction is not material to finding of
disability); Rehder v. Apfel,
205 F.3d 1056, 1059 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-