Filed: Mar. 09, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-3842 _ Anna Marie Goodin, for Robert P. * Gaskins, a minor, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security Administration, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 3, 2000 Filed: March 9, 2000 _ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Anna Marie Goodin, for Robert P. Gaskins, a mino
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-3842 _ Anna Marie Goodin, for Robert P. * Gaskins, a minor, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security Administration, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 3, 2000 Filed: March 9, 2000 _ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Anna Marie Goodin, for Robert P. Gaskins, a minor..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-3842 ___________ Anna Marie Goodin, for Robert P. * Gaskins, a minor, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security Administration, * * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: March 3, 2000 Filed: March 9, 2000 ___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Anna Marie Goodin, for Robert P. Gaskins, a minor, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment affirming the social security commissioner's denial of Goodin's application for supplemental security income benefits. After careful review of the parties' briefs and the administrative record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the decision of the commissioner that Goodin's son is not disabled for social security purposes. Goodin's appeal presents no novel issues to justify an extended discussion. We thus affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
