Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. John F. Jackman, 99-4053 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 99-4053 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 24, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-4053 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. John F. Jackman, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: November 7, 2000 Filed: November 24, 2000 _ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BRIGHT, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. John Jackman pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2315, and the district court1
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 99-4053
                                    ___________

United States of America,                *
                                         *
             Appellee,                   *
                                         * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                 * District Court for the
                                         * Western District of Missouri.
John F. Jackman,                         *
                                         *    [UNPUBLISHED]
             Appellant.                  *
                                    ___________

                            Submitted: November 7, 2000
                                Filed: November 24, 2000
                                    ___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BRIGHT, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

       John Jackman pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 2315, and the district court1 sentenced him to 8 months confinement and 2
years supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has filed a brief and moved to
withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and Jackman has filed
a pro se supplemental brief. They both argue that Jackman received ineffective
assistance of counsel.


      1
        The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
      Jackman’s ineffective-assistance claims--and his related claim that his guilty plea
was invalid--should be presented in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings. See United States
v. Martin, 
59 F.3d 767
, 771 (8th Cir. 1995). Having reviewed the record independently
pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
488 U.S. 75
(1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues
for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw.

      A true copy.

             Attest:

                     CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                                           -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer