Filed: Oct. 25, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-4246 _ Ann Farr, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. County of Wright, * * (Unpublished) Defendant - Appellee. * _ Submitted: October 18, 2000 Filed: October 25, 2000 _ Before MURPHY, HEANEY, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ann Farr had a cabin in Wright County which was destroyed by fire, and in order to rebuild she needed to obtain variances from t
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-4246 _ Ann Farr, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. County of Wright, * * (Unpublished) Defendant - Appellee. * _ Submitted: October 18, 2000 Filed: October 25, 2000 _ Before MURPHY, HEANEY, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ann Farr had a cabin in Wright County which was destroyed by fire, and in order to rebuild she needed to obtain variances from th..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-4246
___________
Ann Farr, *
*
Plaintiff - Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
County of Wright, *
* (Unpublished)
Defendant - Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: October 18, 2000
Filed: October 25, 2000
___________
Before MURPHY, HEANEY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ann Farr had a cabin in Wright County which was destroyed by fire, and in
order to rebuild she needed to obtain variances from the zoning ordinance. The
Wright County Board of Adjustment denied the variances after a hearing, citing sewer
problems, the number of variances sought, lot size, neighbor opposition, and
driveway problems. Farr brought this action against Wright County under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983, claiming that her constitutional rights to just compensation, due process and
equal protection were violated. The district court1 dismissed the complaint with
1
The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
prejudice after denying Farr’s motion for declaratory judgment. After a careful
review of the record, we affirm the judgment on the basis of the district court’s
opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-