Filed: Apr. 18, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-1651 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Gregory Lamont Charles, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: April 6, 2001 Filed: April 18, 2001 _ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Gregory Lamont Charles contends the district court committed reversi
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-1651 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Gregory Lamont Charles, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: April 6, 2001 Filed: April 18, 2001 _ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Gregory Lamont Charles contends the district court committed reversib..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-1651 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Gregory Lamont Charles, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: April 6, 2001 Filed: April 18, 2001 ___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Gregory Lamont Charles contends the district court committed reversible error by refusing to declare a mistrial and by allowing the government to bolster the testimony of one of its witnesses. Having satisfied ourselves that the district court correctly resolved Charles's challenges and that the appeal simply involves the application of settled principles of law to unique facts, we conclude the issues do not warrant a comprehensive opinion. We thus reject Charles's contentions and affirm his conviction without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
