Filed: Apr. 09, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2038 _ Pat Hall, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Hormel Foods, Corp., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 4, 2001 Filed: April 9, 2001 _ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Pat Hall appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employme
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2038 _ Pat Hall, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Hormel Foods, Corp., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 4, 2001 Filed: April 9, 2001 _ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Pat Hall appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employmen..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-2038
___________
Pat Hall, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Hormel Foods, Corp., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 4, 2001
Filed: April 9, 2001
___________
Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Pat Hall appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his action brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans
with Disabilities Act, the Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act, and the Nebraska
Act Prohibiting Unjust Discrimination in Employment Because of Age. Upon our de
novo review, see Widoe v. Dist. #111 Otoe County Sch.,
147 F.3d 726, 728 (8th Cir.
1
The Honorable William G. Cambridge, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska, now retired.
1998), we conclude the district court’s judgment was proper for the reasons stated in
its thorough opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-