Filed: Mar. 27, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2262 _ Walter Garrett; Dorothy J. Garrett; * Ruby McDonald; Nausicca Brown, a * Minor Child, * * Appeal from the United States Appellants, * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] L. Clarke, Sgt.; D. Epps, Sgt. # 144; * F. West, Maj. # 63, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: March 22, 2001 Filed: March 27, 2001 _ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs Walter Garrett, Do
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2262 _ Walter Garrett; Dorothy J. Garrett; * Ruby McDonald; Nausicca Brown, a * Minor Child, * * Appeal from the United States Appellants, * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] L. Clarke, Sgt.; D. Epps, Sgt. # 144; * F. West, Maj. # 63, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: March 22, 2001 Filed: March 27, 2001 _ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs Walter Garrett, Dor..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-2262
___________
Walter Garrett; Dorothy J. Garrett; *
Ruby McDonald; Nausicca Brown, a *
Minor Child, *
* Appeal from the United States
Appellants, * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
v. *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
L. Clarke, Sgt.; D. Epps, Sgt. # 144; *
F. West, Maj. # 63, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: March 22, 2001
Filed: March 27, 2001
___________
Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs Walter Garrett, Dorothy Garrett, Ruby McDonald, and Nausicca
Brown appeal the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment as to some
claims, and dismissal of other claims, in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.
1
The HONORABLE DONALD J. STOHR, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
After reviewing the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude
that the district court’s order of dismissal and grant of summary judgment were correct;
the district court did not grant summary judgment prematurely; and plaintiffs’ other
arguments are unavailing.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-