Filed: Apr. 16, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2590 _ Keith Kulow, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * Cargill, Incorporated, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 11, 2001 Filed: April 16, 2001 _ Before BOWMAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and CARMAN,1 Judge. _ PER CURIAM. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Cargill, Incorporated, on Keith Kulow's claim of age discrimination. The District Court2 enter
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-2590 _ Keith Kulow, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * Cargill, Incorporated, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 11, 2001 Filed: April 16, 2001 _ Before BOWMAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and CARMAN,1 Judge. _ PER CURIAM. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Cargill, Incorporated, on Keith Kulow's claim of age discrimination. The District Court2 entere..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-2590 ___________ Keith Kulow, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * Cargill, Incorporated, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: April 11, 2001 Filed: April 16, 2001 ___________ Before BOWMAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and CARMAN,1 Judge. ___________ PER CURIAM. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Cargill, Incorporated, on Keith Kulow's claim of age discrimination. The District Court2 entered judgment on the jury verdict and denied Kulow's motion for a new trial. Kulow timely appeals. 1 The Honorable Gregory W. Carman, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 2 The Honorable Edward J. McManus, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. Seeking reversal and remand for a new trial, Kulow argues that the District Court abused its discretion in submitting a verdict form combining what Kulow characterizes as two age discrimination claims into one. Kulow also argues that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence the testimony of Barb Kula. We disagree with both contentions. Having considered the matter, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in either respect. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-