United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 00-3046
                                    ___________

United States of America,           *
                                    *
          Plaintiff-Appellee,       *
                                    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                              * District Court for the
                                    * District of South Dakota.
Wayne Hobart Big Crow,              *
                                    * [UNPUBLISHED]
          Defendant-Appellant.      *
                               ___________

                              Submitted: March 13, 2001

                                   Filed: April 6, 2001
                                    ___________

Before MURPHY, LAY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________


PER CURIAM.


       The defendant, Wayne Hobart Big Crow (“Big Crow”), was charged in a two-
count Indictment with involuntary manslaughter and assault resulting in serious bodily
injury. The Indictment was the result of an accident Big Crow caused while speeding
and driving drunk. The driver of the other vehicle, a fifteen-year-old girl, was killed,
and the passenger, a four-year-old girl, was left paralyzed, unable to move from the
chin down.
       Big Crow entered into a plea agreement with the Government whereby he would
plead guilty to the charge of assault resulting in serious bodily injury in exchange for
the Government dismissing the involuntary manslaughter charge and recommending a
three-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. At the sentencing
hearing, the district court1 granted Big Crow the three-level downward adjustment.
However, the court departed upward based upon death, physical injury, adequacy of
criminal history category, and extreme psychological injury.

       On appeal, Big Crow argues that the district court erred in departing upward
from the sentencing guidelines.2 Big Crow believes he deserved a lesser sentence
based on his plea of guilty. According to Big Crow, there was no incentive to plead
guilty when the result was no different than if his case had gone before a jury.

       This court reviews sentencing departures under an abuse of discretion standard.
See United States v. Washington, 

(8th Cir. 1997). Based on our review
of the district court's Judgment, specifically its Statement of Reasons, we find no abuse
of discretion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

      JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.




      1
        The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota, presiding.
      2
        In his brief, Big Crow also raised an argument that he did not receive the three-
level downward departure for acceptance of responsibility. However, he now concedes
that the three-level reduction was applied.

                                          -2-
A true copy.

      Attest:

         CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                           -3-