Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Charles Armstrong v. Jonathan Ford, 00-3625 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 00-3625 Visitors: 33
Filed: Jan. 05, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-3625 _ Charles Armstrong, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Johnathan Ford; Nathaniel Murdock; * District of Missouri. Midland Manors, * * (UNPUBLISHED) Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 22, 2000 Filed: January 5, 2001 _ Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se ci
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 00-3625
                                    ___________

Charles Armstrong,                   *
                                     *
            Appellant,               *
                                     *
      v.                             * Appeal from the United States
                                     * District Court for the Eastern
Johnathan Ford; Nathaniel Murdock;   * District of Missouri.
Midland Manors,                      *
                                     *        (UNPUBLISHED)
            Appellees.               *
                                ___________

                           Submitted: December 22, 2000

                                Filed: January 5, 2001
                                    ___________

Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit
      Judges.
                         ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se civil
rights complaint against private-party defendants. After careful review of the record,
we conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii); Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), (e)(1); Bray v.


      1
        The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 
506 U.S. 263
, 267-68 (1993); West v. Atkins, 
487 U.S. 42
, 48 (1988); Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp., 
172 F.3d 531
, 536 (8th Cir.
1999). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

      A true copy.

            Attest:

                     CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer