Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United Fire & v. Fenton, LLC, 00-3847 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 00-3847 Visitors: 36
Filed: Oct. 04, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ Nos. 00-3847 and 00-3848 _ United Fire and Casualty Insurance * Company * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Paul L. Garvey, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellant, * * Fenton. L.L.C., * * Intervenor - Appellant. * _ Submitted: June 11, 2001 Filed: October 4, 2001 _ Before McMILLIAN, R. ARNOLD, and HALL,* Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM: Paul Garvey and Fenton
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ Nos. 00-3847 and 00-3848 ___________ United Fire and Casualty Insurance * Company * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Paul L. Garvey, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellant, * * Fenton. L.L.C., * * Intervenor - Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: June 11, 2001 Filed: October 4, 2001 ___________ Before McMILLIAN, R. ARNOLD, and HALL,* Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM: Paul Garvey and Fenton, L.L.C., appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of United Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. We * The Honorable Cynthia Holcomb Hall, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. 1 agree with the district court that the “unique” living situation of the Garvey family does not afford Paul Garvey an insurable interest in the subject property. Appellants, however, suggested in their brief and contended at oral argument that Paul Garvey obtained the insurance on the property as an agent for his parents as undisclosed principals. There is evidence in the record that James Garvey instructed Paul to obtain the insurance, and that Paul did so at his behest. However, the parties have not fully briefed the agency question to this court. Nor has the district court had adequate opportunity to address the issue. Under the circumstances, we believe it best to remand the case for parties to present the issue to the district court in the first instance. REMANDED. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer