Filed: Apr. 10, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-1341 _ Tarvuell Clark, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Hugh G. Harris, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 2, 2001 Filed: April 10, 2001 _ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal prisoner Tarvuell Clark appeals the district court’s1 pre-service dismissal of his Bivens2 action and moves to proceed in
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-1341 _ Tarvuell Clark, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Hugh G. Harris, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 2, 2001 Filed: April 10, 2001 _ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal prisoner Tarvuell Clark appeals the district court’s1 pre-service dismissal of his Bivens2 action and moves to proceed in f..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-1341
___________
Tarvuell Clark, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
Hugh G. Harris, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 2, 2001
Filed: April 10, 2001
___________
Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal prisoner Tarvuell Clark appeals the district court’s1 pre-service dismissal
of his Bivens2 action and moves to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Having
carefully reviewed the record, see Moore v. Sims,
200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000)
1
The Honorable Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the
Western District of Missouri.
2
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S.
388 (1971).
(per curiam), we conclude that Mr. Clark’s complaint failed to state an Eighth
Amendment claim upon which relief may be granted. Because Mr. Clark has paid the
appellate filing fee, we deny his IFP motion as moot.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-