Filed: Aug. 24, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-1560 _ Conray Carroll, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Mike Huckabee, Governor of Arkansas; * Leroy Brownlee, Chairman, Post Prison * [UNPUBLISHED] Transfer Board; Tamika Hrobowski, * Prosecuting Attorney; Terry Cass, * Parole Administrator, Post Prison * Transfer Board, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: August 23, 2001 Filed: August 24, 2001 _ Before BOWMAN, LO
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-1560 _ Conray Carroll, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Mike Huckabee, Governor of Arkansas; * Leroy Brownlee, Chairman, Post Prison * [UNPUBLISHED] Transfer Board; Tamika Hrobowski, * Prosecuting Attorney; Terry Cass, * Parole Administrator, Post Prison * Transfer Board, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: August 23, 2001 Filed: August 24, 2001 _ Before BOWMAN, LOK..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-1560
___________
Conray Carroll, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Mike Huckabee, Governor of Arkansas; *
Leroy Brownlee, Chairman, Post Prison * [UNPUBLISHED]
Transfer Board; Tamika Hrobowski, *
Prosecuting Attorney; Terry Cass, *
Parole Administrator, Post Prison *
Transfer Board, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: August 23, 2001
Filed: August 24, 2001
___________
Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Conray Carroll appeals from the district court’s1 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having
1
The Honorable William R. Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
carefully reviewed the record and appellant’s brief, see Cooper v. Schriro,
189 F.3d
781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo review), we agree with the district court
that, for the reasons the court explained, the complaint failed to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted and sought monetary relief from a defendant who is
immune.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
We deny all pending motions.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-