Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gary Barfield v. Duong Ly, 01-3723 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 01-3723 Visitors: 32
Filed: Mar. 08, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-3723 _ Gary Barfield, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Dr. Duong Ly, East Arkansas * District Court for the Eastern Regional Unit, ADC; Bernard * District of Arkansas. Williams, Infirmary Manager, East * Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Max * [UNPUBLISHED] Mobley, Deputy Director of Health * Services, Arkansas Department of * Correction, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: March 6, 2002 Filed: March 8, 2002 _ Before WOLL
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 01-3723
                                   ___________

Gary Barfield,                        *
                                      *
                  Appellant,          *
                                      *
      v.                              *
                                      * Appeal from the United States
Dr. Duong Ly, East Arkansas           * District Court for the Eastern
Regional Unit, ADC; Bernard           * District of Arkansas.
Williams, Infirmary Manager, East     *
Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Max      *      [UNPUBLISHED]
Mobley, Deputy Director of Health     *
Services, Arkansas Department of      *
Correction,                           *
                                      *
                  Appellees.          *
                                 ___________

                             Submitted: March 6, 2002

                                  Filed: March 8, 2002
                                   ___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

      Gary Barfield challenges the district court's dismissal of Barfield's 42 U.S.C.
ยง 1983 lawsuit after holding a pretrial evidentiary hearing. After careful
consideration of all the evidence, the district court concluded there was no evidence
from which a jury could find the correctional officials acted with deliberate
indifference to Barfield's serious medical needs. Based on our de novo review, see
Randle v. Parker, 
48 F.3d 301
, 303 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review), we agree
with the district court and thus affirm the order of dismissal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

      A true copy.

            Attest:

                     CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer