Filed: Nov. 21, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-3855 _ Robert Zick, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. City of Maplewood, Minnesota; * Don Winger; Mike Ryan; * [UNPUBLISHED] Dave Thomalla; John Banick, * * Defendants-Appellees. * _ No. 01-3857 _ Kevin Berglund, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * City of Maplewood, Minnesota; * Don Winger; Mike Ryan; * Dave Thomalla; John Banick, * * Defendants-Appellees
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-3855 _ Robert Zick, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. City of Maplewood, Minnesota; * Don Winger; Mike Ryan; * [UNPUBLISHED] Dave Thomalla; John Banick, * * Defendants-Appellees. * _ No. 01-3857 _ Kevin Berglund, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * City of Maplewood, Minnesota; * Don Winger; Mike Ryan; * Dave Thomalla; John Banick, * * Defendants-Appellees...
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 01-3855 ___________ Robert Zick, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. City of Maplewood, Minnesota; * Don Winger; Mike Ryan; * [UNPUBLISHED] Dave Thomalla; John Banick, * * Defendants-Appellees. * ___________ No. 01-3857 ___________ Kevin Berglund, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * City of Maplewood, Minnesota; * Don Winger; Mike Ryan; * Dave Thomalla; John Banick, * * Defendants-Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: November 6, 2002 Filed: November 21, 2002 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, LAY, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs Robert Zick and Kevin Berglund have separately appealed from the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants, City of Maplewood; Don Winger; Mike Ryan; Dave Thomalla; and John Banick, on all issues. The claims of both parties arise from the same set of facts. This court, on its own motion, consolidates the two cases for purposes of deciding the issues on appeal. We have reviewed the record of the district court and find no error. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. 1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-