Filed: Apr. 26, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-1011 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Jorge Alfredo Pina-Arellano, also * known as Jorge Alberto Lopez, also * [UNPUBLISHED] known as Jose Lopez-Gonzalez, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: April 24, 2002 Filed: April 26, 2002 _ Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jorge Pina-Arellano appeals the sentence imposed by
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-1011 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Jorge Alfredo Pina-Arellano, also * known as Jorge Alberto Lopez, also * [UNPUBLISHED] known as Jose Lopez-Gonzalez, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: April 24, 2002 Filed: April 26, 2002 _ Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jorge Pina-Arellano appeals the sentence imposed by t..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-1011
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Southern District of Iowa.
Jorge Alfredo Pina-Arellano, also *
known as Jorge Alberto Lopez, also * [UNPUBLISHED]
known as Jose Lopez-Gonzalez, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 24, 2002
Filed: April 26, 2002
___________
Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Jorge Pina-Arellano appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after
he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326(a) and (b)(2). Specifically, Pina contends he was entitled to a downward
departure because--as an alien subject to removal--he is subject to a longer and
harsher period of incarceration.
1
The HONORABLE ROBERT W. PRATT, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.
As he concedes, this court rejected his argument in United States v.
Cardosa-Rodriguez,
241 F.3d 613, 614 (8th Cir. 2001) (deportable aliens’ ineligibility
for Bureau of Prisons benefits does not provide basis for downward departure in
illegal-reentry cases), and only this court en banc may overrule that decision, see
Campbell v. Purkett,
957 F.2d 535, 536 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam).
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-