Filed: Nov. 05, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-1909 _ Henryk Szwedo; Grace Szwedo, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. HCA Health Services of Midwest, * Inc., d/b/a Columbia Doctors Hospital; * [UNPUBLISHED] Delorise Kocher; Carolyn Drew; * Michael D. Huckabay, Sr.; Tim Boone; * D. B. Allen, M.D., originally sued as * M.D. D.B. Allan; Otis Edge, M.D., * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 1, 2002 Filed: No
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-1909 _ Henryk Szwedo; Grace Szwedo, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. HCA Health Services of Midwest, * Inc., d/b/a Columbia Doctors Hospital; * [UNPUBLISHED] Delorise Kocher; Carolyn Drew; * Michael D. Huckabay, Sr.; Tim Boone; * D. B. Allen, M.D., originally sued as * M.D. D.B. Allan; Otis Edge, M.D., * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 1, 2002 Filed: Nov..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-1909
___________
Henryk Szwedo; Grace Szwedo, *
*
Appellants, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
HCA Health Services of Midwest, *
Inc., d/b/a Columbia Doctors Hospital; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Delorise Kocher; Carolyn Drew; *
Michael D. Huckabay, Sr.; Tim Boone; *
D. B. Allen, M.D., originally sued as *
M.D. D.B. Allan; Otis Edge, M.D., *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: November 1, 2002
Filed: November 5, 2002
___________
Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Henryk and Grace Szwedo appeal the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in their action invoking the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et. seq. (RICO). After careful de novo review
1
The HONORABLE WILLIAM R. WILSON, JR., United States District Judge
for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
of the record, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated
by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny all
pending motions.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-