Filed: May 01, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-3308 _ Roseann B. Gottschalk, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. * Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner * of the Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 24, 2003 Filed: May 1, 2003 _ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Roseann B. Gottschalk appeals the judgment of the district court** affirming the
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-3308 _ Roseann B. Gottschalk, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. * Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner * of the Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 24, 2003 Filed: May 1, 2003 _ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Roseann B. Gottschalk appeals the judgment of the district court** affirming the ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3308
___________
Roseann B. Gottschalk, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Arkansas.
*
Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner *
of the Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 24, 2003
Filed: May 1, 2003
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Roseann B. Gottschalk appeals the judgment of the district court** affirming the
Social Security Commissioner's denial of disability insurance benefits and
*
Jo Anne B. Barnhart has been appointed to serve as Commissioner of Social
Security and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate
Procedure 43(c).
**
The Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c).
supplemental security income. On appeal, Gottschalk challenges the findings of the
administrative law judge (ALJ) that (1) she retained the ability to perform unskilled
work, and (2) her subjective complaints were not fully credible. After careful review,
we reject both of these arguments and conclude substantial evidence on the record as
a whole, and in particular the findings of a consulting mental health professional,
supported the ALJ's determination Gottschalk was not disabled within the meaning
of the Social Security Act. See Cunningham v. Apfel,
222 F.3d 496, 500 (8th Cir.
2000) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-