Filed: Apr. 07, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-3511 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Enrique Solano-Machuca, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: April 4, 2003 Filed: April 7, 2003 _ Before LOKEN,* Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Enrique Solano-Machuca pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation after conviction for an aggravated felony
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-3511 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Nebraska. * Enrique Solano-Machuca, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: April 4, 2003 Filed: April 7, 2003 _ Before LOKEN,* Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Enrique Solano-Machuca pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation after conviction for an aggravated felony,..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3511
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Nebraska.
*
Enrique Solano-Machuca, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 4, 2003
Filed: April 7, 2003
___________
Before LOKEN,* Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Enrique Solano-Machuca pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following
deportation after conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326(a), and the district court1 sentenced him to 46 months imprisonment and 3
years supervised release. On appeal, counsel moved to withdraw under Anders v.
*
The Honorable James B. Loken became Chief Judge of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on April 1, 2003.
1
The HONORABLE RICHARD G. KOPF, Chief Judge, United States District
Court for the District of Nebraska.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and filed a brief arguing that the district court erred
in denying Solano-Machuca’s motion for downward departure.
We reject Solano-Machuca’s argument because we do not review discretionary
decisions not to depart where there is no indication the district court believed it
lacked the authority to do so. See United States v. Lopez-Arce,
267 F.3d 775, 783-84
(8th Cir. 2001). Further, having reviewed the record independently under Penson v.
Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-