Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Chetty Mamandur v. Jimmy Earl Power Jr., 02-3898 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 02-3898 Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 27, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-3898 _ Chetty Mamandur; Uma Sunku * Mamandur, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Jimmy Earl Power, Jr.; Prudential * Securities, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: August 5, 2003 Filed: August 27, 2003 _ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Chetty and Uma Sunku Mamandur appeal the district court’s1 order denying their m
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 02-3898
                                    ___________

Chetty Mamandur; Uma Sunku             *
Mamandur,                              *
                                       *
              Appellants,              *
                                       * Appeal from the United States
      v.                               * District Court for the Eastern
                                       * District of Arkansas.
Jimmy Earl Power, Jr.; Prudential      *
Securities, Inc.,                      *       [UNPUBLISHED]
                                       *
              Appellees.               *
                                  ___________

                          Submitted: August 5, 2003
                              Filed: August 27, 2003
                                   ___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                            ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Chetty and Uma Sunku Mamandur appeal the district court’s1 order denying
their motion to vacate an arbitration award, and confirming the award in favor of
Jimmy Earl Power, Jr., and Prudential Securities Incorporated. We affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court, and we conclude that the court did not err in not
holding an evidentiary hearing. Cf. Burton v. Dormire, 
295 F.3d 839
, 848 (8th Cir.


      1
       The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
2002) (declining to remand for hearing because arguments lacked merit and hearing
was legally unnecessary), cert. denied, 
123 S. Ct. 1904
(2003). We also deny the
Mamandurs’ pending motion for remand.

      Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

      A true copy.

            Attest:

                     CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer