Filed: May 23, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-3917 _ Oscar D. Heffner, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the State of Missouri; Missouri Supreme * Eastern District of Missouri. Court; Missouri Court of Appeals, * [UNPUBLISHED] Eastern District of Missouri; James R. * Dowd, Chief Judge of the Missouri * Court of Appeals; Pecola Pendleton, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 20, 2003 Filed: May 23, 2003 _ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Cir
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 02-3917 _ Oscar D. Heffner, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the State of Missouri; Missouri Supreme * Eastern District of Missouri. Court; Missouri Court of Appeals, * [UNPUBLISHED] Eastern District of Missouri; James R. * Dowd, Chief Judge of the Missouri * Court of Appeals; Pecola Pendleton, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 20, 2003 Filed: May 23, 2003 _ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3917
___________
Oscar D. Heffner, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
State of Missouri; Missouri Supreme * Eastern District of Missouri.
Court; Missouri Court of Appeals, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Eastern District of Missouri; James R. *
Dowd, Chief Judge of the Missouri *
Court of Appeals; Pecola Pendleton, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: May 20, 2003
Filed: May 23, 2003
___________
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Oscar D. Heffner appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil rights
complaint. Upon de novo review, we conclude that dismissal of Heffner’s claims
1
The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
against the state defendants was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.
We also conclude that dismissal of Heffner’s claims against Pecola Pendleton was
proper because Heffner did not allege that she violated his federal rights or that she
acted under color of state law. See Hott v. Hennepin County,
260 F.3d 901, 905 (8th
Cir. 2001).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-