Filed: Dec. 30, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1213 _ John G. Cunningham, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 19, 2003 Filed: December 30, 2003 _ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. John G. Cunningham appeals the district court’s* order upholding
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1213 _ John G. Cunningham, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: December 19, 2003 Filed: December 30, 2003 _ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. John G. Cunningham appeals the district court’s* order upholding ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1213
___________
John G. Cunningham, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, *
Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 19, 2003
Filed: December 30, 2003
___________
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
John G. Cunningham appeals the district court’s* order upholding the Social
Security Commissioner's decision to deny Cunningham disability insurance and
supplemental security income benefits. We conclude substantial evidence in the
record as a whole supports the administrative law judge’s determination at step two
of the sequential evaluation process that Cunningham did not show he has a
*
The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
medically severe impairment, and the judgment of the district court is correct.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-