Filed: Nov. 03, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1396 _ Larry Wayne Natt, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Marvin D. Morrison, Warden, FCI, * [UNPUBLISHED] Forrest City, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: October 31, 2003 Filed: November 3, 2003 _ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Larry Wayne Natt appeals the district court's* order dismissing Natt's 28
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1396 _ Larry Wayne Natt, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Marvin D. Morrison, Warden, FCI, * [UNPUBLISHED] Forrest City, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: October 31, 2003 Filed: November 3, 2003 _ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Larry Wayne Natt appeals the district court's* order dismissing Natt's 28 ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1396
___________
Larry Wayne Natt, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Arkansas.
*
Marvin D. Morrison, Warden, FCI, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Forrest City, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: October 31, 2003
Filed: November 3, 2003
___________
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Larry Wayne Natt appeals the district court's* order dismissing
Natt's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Because the district court correctly concluded Natt's
inability to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion did not make section 2255
*
The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention, we affirm. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-