Filed: Jan. 08, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1740 _ Linda Jane Hicks, * * Plaintiff/Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western United States Department of * District of Arkansas. Agriculture; Benjamin Reynolds; * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendants/Appellees, * * Martin Title and Closing Services; * Sheila Busch; Jan Atchley, doing * business as Select Realty; Barbara * Davis; Union Bank of Mena, * * Defendants, * * George Page, doing business as
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1740 _ Linda Jane Hicks, * * Plaintiff/Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western United States Department of * District of Arkansas. Agriculture; Benjamin Reynolds; * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendants/Appellees, * * Martin Title and Closing Services; * Sheila Busch; Jan Atchley, doing * business as Select Realty; Barbara * Davis; Union Bank of Mena, * * Defendants, * * George Page, doing business as *..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1740
___________
Linda Jane Hicks, *
*
Plaintiff/Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
United States Department of * District of Arkansas.
Agriculture; Benjamin Reynolds; *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Defendants/Appellees, *
*
Martin Title and Closing Services; *
Sheila Busch; Jan Atchley, doing *
business as Select Realty; Barbara *
Davis; Union Bank of Mena, *
*
Defendants, *
*
George Page, doing business as *
Page Enterprises, *
*
Defendant/Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 26, 2003
Filed: January 8, 2004
___________
Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Linda Jane Hicks appeals the district court’s1 order (1) granting summary
judgment against her on her claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971); (2) dismissing without prejudice her
claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq.; (3) dismissing
with prejudice her claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986; and (4) declining
jurisdiction over any pendent state-law claims. After de novo review, see Turner v.
Holbrook,
278 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir. 2002), we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.
-2-