Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Michael Curry, 03-1801 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 03-1801 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 09, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-1801 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Michael Curry, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: December 26, 2003 Filed: January 9, 2004 _ Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Michael Curry (Curry) challenges as excessive the 9-month prison sentence the district court1 im
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 03-1801
                                   ___________

United States of America,               *
                                        *
            Appellee,                   *
                                        * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                * District Court for the
                                        * Eastern District of Missouri.
Michael Curry,                          *
                                        *       [UNPUBLISHED]
            Appellant.                  *
                                   ___________

                            Submitted: December 26, 2003

                                Filed: January 9, 2004
                                  ___________

Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                            ___________

PER CURIAM.

      In this direct criminal appeal, Michael Curry (Curry) challenges as excessive
the 9-month prison sentence the district court1 imposed following revocation of
Curry’s supervised release. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that
Curry’s revocation sentence is well below the maximum imprisonment term
authorized by statute, is within the range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines


      1
       The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri.
policy statements, and is not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Grimes, 
54 F.3d 489
, 492 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review).

      Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
                     ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer