Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Cordell Sawyer, 03-3092 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 03-3092 Visitors: 51
Filed: Feb. 12, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3092 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Cordell Sawyer, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: February 6, 2004 Filed: February 12, 2004 _ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Cordell Sawyer appeals the district court’s* denial of Sawyer’s 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) motion to terminate supervi
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 03-3092
                                    ___________

United States of America,                *
                                         *
                    Appellee,            * Appeal from the United States
                                         * District Court for the Eastern
      v.                                 * District of Missouri.
                                         *
Cordell Sawyer,                          *     [UNPUBLISHED]
                                         *
                    Appellant.           *
                                    ___________

                              Submitted: February 6, 2004

                                   Filed: February 12, 2004
                                    ___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                         ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Cordell Sawyer appeals the district court’s* denial of Sawyer’s 18 U.S.C.
§ 3583(e)(1) motion to terminate supervision. After carefully reviewing the record,
we conclude the district court considered the relevant sentencing factors, see 
id., and thus
did not abuse its discretion, see United States v. Jeanes, 
150 F.3d 483
, 484 (5th
Cir. 1998) (recognizing § 3583(e)(1) confers broad discretion on district court).
Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

      *
       The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer