Filed: Aug. 27, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3243 _ Kimberly Ann Barnes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. National Archives Records * Administration, John W. Carlin, * [UNPUBLISHED] Archivist, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: August 23, 2004 Filed: August 27, 2004 _ Before SMITH, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kimberly Ann Barnes appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summ
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3243 _ Kimberly Ann Barnes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. National Archives Records * Administration, John W. Carlin, * [UNPUBLISHED] Archivist, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: August 23, 2004 Filed: August 27, 2004 _ Before SMITH, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kimberly Ann Barnes appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summa..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-3243
___________
Kimberly Ann Barnes, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
National Archives Records *
Administration, John W. Carlin, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Archivist, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 23, 2004
Filed: August 27, 2004
___________
Before SMITH, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Kimberly Ann Barnes appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action brought under Title VII,
the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Rehabilitation Act of 1993, and the
Notification and Federal Employee Anti-Discrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002,
1
The Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
against her employer, the United States National Archives and Records
Administration. Having carefully reviewed the record de novo, see Winkle v. S.W.
Bell Tel. Co.,
195 F.3d 418, 420 (8th Cir. 1999) (standard of review), we affirm for
the reasons explained by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-