Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dale L. Oyer v. Commissioner IRS, 03-3389 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 03-3389 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 20, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3389 _ Dale L. Oyer, Transferee, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Commissioner of Internal * Revenue Service, * * Appellee. * _ Appeals from the United States Tax Court. No. 03-3390 _ [UNPUBLISHED] Acme Leasing Trust, Transferee, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Commissioner of Internal * Revenue Service, * * Appellee. * _ No. 03-3391 _ ABC Seamless Trust, Transferee, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Commissioner of Internal * Revenue Service, * * Appe
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3389 ___________ Dale L. Oyer, Transferee, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Commissioner of Internal * Revenue Service, * * Appellee. * ___________ Appeals from the United States Tax Court. No. 03-3390 ___________ [UNPUBLISHED] Acme Leasing Trust, Transferee, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Commissioner of Internal * Revenue Service, * * Appellee. * ___________ No. 03-3391 ___________ ABC Seamless Trust, Transferee, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Commissioner of Internal * Revenue Service, * * Appellee. * ___________ No. 03-3392 ___________ Shirley J. Oyer, Transferee, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Commissioner of Internal * Revenue Service, * * Appellee. * -2- ___________ Submitted: April 16, 2004 Filed: May 20, 2004 ___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MAGILL, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the Tax Court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Internal Revenue Service in taxpayers' suit challenging the IRS's determination that they were liable as transferees for taxes in the amount of approximately $90,000. The Tax Court held, inter alia, that the doctrine of res judicata barred taxpayers from contesting the amount owed because the court had previously entered stipulated decisions against taxpayers that determined the taxes that are the subject of the dispute here. We have carefully examined the record and conclude that the Tax Court correctly applied the doctrine of res judicata in this case. We therefore affirm on the basis of its well-reasoned decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -3-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer