Filed: Sep. 10, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-1554 _ Lloyd R. Holmes, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * State of Georgia; Linda L. Thurn, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: September 2, 2004 Filed: September 10, 2004 _ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lloyd R. Holmes appeals the district court’s* pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) of Holmes's compla
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-1554 _ Lloyd R. Holmes, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * State of Georgia; Linda L. Thurn, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: September 2, 2004 Filed: September 10, 2004 _ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lloyd R. Holmes appeals the district court’s* pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) of Holmes's complai..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-1554
___________
Lloyd R. Holmes, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Missouri.
*
State of Georgia; Linda L. Thurn, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: September 2, 2004
Filed: September 10, 2004
___________
Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Lloyd R. Holmes appeals the district court’s* pre-service dismissal under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) of Holmes's complaint asserting violations of the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Fourteenth Amendment. After careful de
novo review, see Moore v. Sims,
200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam),
we conclude dismissal was proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
______________________________
*
The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.